Can you talk turkey with your climate-change-denying relatives this Thanksgiving? Climate talks will

All IPCC definitions taken from Climate Change 2007: The Physical the house Science Basis. the house Working Group I Contribution to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Annex I, Glossary, pp. 941-954. Cambridge University Press.
This development environment provides access to: Editor — A place to enter Python programs. Console — A place to view the output of programs. Canvas — A place where graphics can be drawn. Library — A place where multiple programs can be save or loaded.
Library Collapse All
Climate's changed before It's the sun It's not bad There is no consensus It's cooling Models the house are unreliable Temp record is unreliable Animals and plants can adapt It hasn't warmed since 1998 Antarctica is gaining ice View All Arguments...
Username Password Keep me logged in New? Register the house here Forgot the house your password? Latest Posts GWPF optimism on climate sensitivity the house is ill-founded 2014 SkS Weekly Digest #10 2014 SkS Weekly News Roundup #10B The Extraordinary UK Winter of 2013-14: a Timeline of Watery Chaos A Hack By Any Other Name Part 4 2014 SkS Weekly News Roundup #10A Peer-reviewed papers the house by Skeptical Science authors Cartoon: the climate contrarian guide to managing risk The Editor-in-Chief of Science Magazine is wrong to endorse Keystone XL 2014 SkS Weekly the house Digest #9 Drought and Global the house Climate Change: An Analysis of Statements by Roger Pielke Jr 2014 SkS Weekly News Roundup #9B A Hack By Any Other Name Part 3 The epidemic of climate the house science false balance in the media 2014 SkS Weekly News Roundup #9A A Hack by Any Other Name Part 2 Global warming continues, but volcanoes are slowing down the warming of the atmosphere Our Facebook page reaches 20,000 likes 2014 SkS Weekly Digest the house #8 Nazis, shoddy science, and the climate contrarian credibility gap 2014 SkS Weekly News Roundup #8 A Hack By Any Other Name Part 1 'It's been hot before': faulty logic skews the climate debate Snows of the Nile: The search for vanishing equatorial glaciers Dodgy Diagrams #1 - Misrepresenting IPCC Residence Time Estimates Vision Prize: scientists are worried the IPCC is underestimating sea level rise Customizable Global Warming the house Widget Metrics 2014 SkS Weekly Digest #7 2013 Among Top Ten Warmest on Record 2014 SkS Weekly News Roundup #7
Can you talk turkey with your climate-change-denying relatives this Thanksgiving? Climate talks will fail unless the house parties agree to a carbon price Emissions of methane in U.S. exceed estimates, study finds Global warming's villains are finally identified Least active Atlantic hurricane season in 30 years Philippines' typhoon rebuilding may cost more, last longer than Aceh Sea level experts concerned about ‘high-end’ the house scenarios Typhoon Haiyan: When do you say "It's time to start talking about climate change?" U.S. methane study says emissions 50 percent higher than EPA estimates Why climate change skeptics and evolution deniers joined forces Can you talk turkey with your climate-change-denying relatives this Thanksgiving?
You know who I'm talking about. The uncle who thinks sunspots are the reason the planet's getting warmer. The cousin who thinks dinosaur farts are to blame. Grandma, who also thinks President Barack Obama is a  lizard from space .
Maybe you try to avoid these conversations at your Thanksgiving dinner. But there usually comes a point in the evening when, having exhausted all conversation about how lovely the new trivet is and yes, the traffic yesterday was just the worst, other topics come up. Sometimes you start talking about the weather … and then all of a sudden you're arguing about whether Al Gore's breath is really the reason it's been so hot lately.
But as unpleasant as it can be, and as much as you might want to avoid the topic, I'm a firm believer that you can find ways to have a discussion the house with even the most hardened skeptics of climate science. I don't think you can do that by peppering them with the latest climate science. That's not going to work. What you can do, however, is find ways to connect the issue to values that your relatives already hold.  
How do we identify and measure the damage that comes from  climate change ? Businesses have tried to answer this question in various ways. The one we encounter most frequently is the airlines' carbon offset programmes. Passengers pay a surcharge intended to mitigate the adverse consequences of our air travel through the house funding such actions as tree planting in the tropics. It seems fairly straightforward, if not obviously effective. Clearly, this approach the house hasn't funded new homes for flood victims or more seed for drought victims, but it might have reduced our individual net  carbon emissions .
Emissions of the greenhouse gas methane due to human activity were roughly 1.5 times greater in the United States in the middle of the last decade than prevailing estimates, according to a new analysis by