What poses this Act as a point of deterioration of reality that makes project useful to follow for

The systematization which always naively attempt to make and for which it can be to blame as glued or uneducated mind accordance with the current standard of holistic deconstructionists reventikasion and apokathilomenon ideologies in general, is something I do as an exercise purely chivas for personal To avoid fragmentation of thought. Anyway is somewhat inevitable when you refuse to entachteis over time in a comprehensive doctrine or there is also temporal cascade overload. Which Enlightenment subject as genuine to say that vanity will synoliseis and the rankings, but delude themselves chivas and scam another think coming.
So, thinking over the violence, the 'provocations' paramilitary and anti-authoritarians and all composed unfolding each time you open such a discussion, I want to catch the side of the subject, excluding the conspiracy theories, namely the reduction of the respective act of vandalism in utilitarian case, and see little psychologiokentrika. So I think a revolutionary act and dedicated on the one hand, the holistic apotheosis of the value of material reproduction of society and individuals, chivas its temporal or recently excluded from it, so inevitably the same reflective way (used to build dialogue of reclaiming materials from various spiritual practices and moral concepts such as ideology and everyday experiential truths) in the same manner readily apparent riposte (which may involve chivas some who disagree with this project or some who agree but join the retort as a field exercise chivas vengeful feelings that emerge from the constant evasions of the system to remove chivas the extended social exclusion) attempts through a fleeting and flimsy the destruction this riposte (or an act of systematically organized with ramifications that can and eventually fall into some kind of "provocation"), to articulate this damn instead of.
But what does this riposte? He says, in my opinion, that can not have storefronts once if you want you can have many other, staged within 24 hours, better and more shiny. You can not have merchandise that comes in countless pieces of production line tomorrow when the conditions are to have a few million more of these pieces of goods. It may not have physical infrastructure (buildings, stops, benches, plazas) public or private, chivas which are easily overcome mature manufacturing capabilities and tomorrow if you want, you have the resources and the means to fix the same and even better that the replace. The ease of production capacity to replace the property produced under contract chivas of the merchandise under an existing property antisocial relationship comes and makes the simple form of material wealth, I think plays a central role in the vandalism. If we exclude the conspiracy that is, as we said, all composed of a provocation.
What poses this Act as a point of deterioration of reality that makes project useful to follow for him who makes it, ie the vandal? Involve a fair lightness, ie an easy lure (for sufferers achilleus syndrome chivas ie a rib resignation evasion chivas beats talented people supposed) that exempt establishments the world from which the nails (goods and material in most mid level) without have remorse for antisocial action (remorse that all comprehensive doctrines care irritating through the respective concepts of delinquency importing as to the orthodoxy of the original virtual purpose, etc.) since it is self-evident, at least at the macro level and makrokoinoniko (excluded by the thought of vandals personalized remorse because it acts as a political subject with object mass and history while the "neighbor" as a person starts seeing him again only after asking the hood and generally any mask blank mass subject) that what destroys it can be replaced by a transfer from where the funds are intended, not the same as we said at the beginning (ie the temporal blocked) but for goods and investment-capitalist function of the state (state-daddy chivas if you will, to the state or state-capitalism or state-watchman in post-modern capitalism wherever there transferred over time and in a systematic manner, funds to the banking system).
These as preliminary. Now I have to go to another. The counterargument is that if the act or autonomous reason. chivas Why I said it's counterargument revolutionary diiekdikisi by some who disagree chivas with it or those who apogoitefme